Retired NASA Engineer, University Professor of Mathematics and
Internationally recognized expert in Optics/Lasers/Satellites.
Dr. Dowdye Bio, some background and qualifications:
http://www.extinctionshift.com/author.htm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(INVISIBLE LINK NOT SHOWING UP! WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)
I have studied Dowdye's work diligently and present an introduction to his research.
While giving a history of Classic Physics vs Relativity
Part 1 - Light and Space
Re-Emissions and Dr. Edward Dowdye
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmOyhzZs2Nc
I REALLY want people to understand the implications of this work and what it means for how we view Time, Space, Reality, the propagation of Light and Gravity.
These are completely different models and alternatives to Doppler Shift, General and Special Relativity.
Complete with equations which yield the same results... but without distortions, corrections and 4D nonsense.
The consequences are harsh to whichever model is mistaken.
Propagation and Re-Emission of Light:
Time is the same from all frames of reference.. not the velocity of light.
"If the velocity of light is even a tiny bit dependent upon the velocity of the light source, then my entire Theory of Relativity and Gravitation is false." -- Einstein
Part 2 - Time and Gravity
Real-Time vs Space-Time:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVqy1nTNfs8
A very detailed compilation of Dowdye's work, Dr. Pierre-Marie Robitaille, some of my own diagrams, technical equations and more.
Plasma Physics - Flaws & Corrections:
Why Should We Question Relativity? (FAQs) - Dr. Dowdye's site:
http://www.extinctionshift.com/FAQ.htm
Twin Paradox and Time Misconceptions:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y16pJLTht4Z4nyAi6y5eudt2BDaggpFP/view?usp=sharing
Models of Gravity and Misconceptions of "Aether":
(INVISIBLE LINK NOT SHOWING UP! WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)
I have studied Dowdye's work diligently and present an introduction to his research.
While giving a history of Classic Physics vs Relativity
Part 1 - Light and Space
Re-Emissions and Dr. Edward Dowdye
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmOyhzZs2Nc
I REALLY want people to understand the implications of this work and what it means for how we view Time, Space, Reality, the propagation of Light and Gravity.
These are completely different models and alternatives to Doppler Shift, General and Special Relativity.
Complete with equations which yield the same results... but without distortions, corrections and 4D nonsense.
The consequences are harsh to whichever model is mistaken.
Propagation and Re-Emission of Light:
Time is the same from all frames of reference.. not the velocity of light.
"If the velocity of light is even a tiny bit dependent upon the velocity of the light source, then my entire Theory of Relativity and Gravitation is false." -- Einstein
Part 2 - Time and Gravity
Real-Time vs Space-Time:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVqy1nTNfs8
A very detailed compilation of Dowdye's work, Dr. Pierre-Marie Robitaille, some of my own diagrams, technical equations and more.
Plasma Physics - Flaws & Corrections:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/UMtr6CvhttWXETJ48
Why Should We Question Relativity? (FAQs) - Dr. Dowdye's site:
http://www.extinctionshift.com/FAQ.htm
Twin Paradox and Time Misconceptions:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y16pJLTht4Z4nyAi6y5eudt2BDaggpFP/view?usp=sharing
Models of Gravity and Misconceptions of "Aether":
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(INVISIBLE LINK NOT SHOWING UP! WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)
A gravitational potential gradient within a plasma atmosphere has absolutely nothing to do with relativity or space curvature.
Here is more information about the misconception of atomic clocks:
(INVISIBLE LINK NOT SHOWING UP! WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)
.
.
The brilliant work of Dr. Edward Dowdye:
http://www.ExtinctionShift.com
Optics, Electrodynamics & Gravitation based from Re-Worked classic physics/ Galilean Transformations under Euclidean Space.
All Relativity models, Aether models and past emissions theories require a medium to distort which shifts a wavepacket or distorts, etc.
And that the wavepackets are always in the same frame of reference.
But Dr. Dowdye shows that elementary math and physics state that NO wavepacket can EVER distort. That a media absorbs a primary and re-emits a secondary from a new frame of reference serving the illusion of distortion of a primary which continues on.
http://www.extinctionshift.com/short...ph_English.pdf
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(INVISIBLE LINK NOT SHOWING UP! WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)
.
The brilliant work of Dr. Edward Dowdye:
http://www.ExtinctionShift.com
Optics, Electrodynamics & Gravitation based from Re-Worked classic physics/ Galilean Transformations under Euclidean Space.
All Relativity models, Aether models and past emissions theories require a medium to distort which shifts a wavepacket or distorts, etc.
And that the wavepackets are always in the same frame of reference.
But Dr. Dowdye shows that elementary math and physics state that NO wavepacket can EVER distort. That a media absorbs a primary and re-emits a secondary from a new frame of reference serving the illusion of distortion of a primary which continues on.
http://www.extinctionshift.com/short...ph_English.pdf
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(INVISIBLE LINK NOT SHOWING UP! WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)
A gravitational potential gradient within a plasma atmosphere has absolutely nothing to do with relativity or space curvature.
Here is more information about the misconception of atomic clocks:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(INVISIBLE LINK NOT SHOWING UP! WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)
Ron Hatch - GPS Co-Inventor Disputes Relativity. Wrote a Book called "Escape from Einstein" which details how GPS
has nothing to do with Relativity. But rather has to do with re-emissions from different frames of reference.
(although Ron Hatch still used the luminiferous aether medium as a distortion of a primary rather than re-emission of secondaries)
https://www.gps.gov/governance/advisory/members/hatch/
Gravitational Potential Gradients and Refraction in Space:
(INVISIBLE LINK NOT SHOWING UP! WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)
Ron Hatch - GPS Co-Inventor Disputes Relativity. Wrote a Book called "Escape from Einstein" which details how GPS
has nothing to do with Relativity. But rather has to do with re-emissions from different frames of reference.
(although Ron Hatch still used the luminiferous aether medium as a distortion of a primary rather than re-emission of secondaries)
https://www.gps.gov/governance/advisory/members/hatch/
Gravitational Potential Gradients and Refraction in Space:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koa8ubwh68Y
Stars Bend Light by Refraction, Not Gravity:
https://youtu.be/HQYVf9I-ncg
More background for Dr. Dowdye:
https://sciencewoke.org/scientist/dr-edward-dowdye/
Inelastic collision and Conservation of Kinetic Energy:
Stars Bend Light by Refraction, Not Gravity:
https://youtu.be/HQYVf9I-ncg
More background for Dr. Dowdye:
https://sciencewoke.org/scientist/dr-edward-dowdye/
Inelastic collision and Conservation of Kinetic Energy:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(INVISIBLE LINK NOT SHOWING UP! WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)
More regarding collisions and center of gravity.
http://www.extinctionshift.com/details08.htm
Challenges to Gravitational Lensing & More:
(INVISIBLE LINK NOT SHOWING UP! WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)
More regarding collisions and center of gravity.
http://www.extinctionshift.com/details08.htm
Challenges to Gravitational Lensing & More:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(INVISIBLE LINK NOT SHOWING UP! WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)
Re-Emissions, Lensing and FTL Propagation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt5zkYMs1SM
Dr. Louis Essen - Atomic Clock Inventor Rejects Relativity:
http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/site/harryricker/2015/05/25/dr-louis-essen-inventor-of-atomic-clock-rejects-einsteins-relativity-theory/
(INVISIBLE LINK NOT SHOWING UP! WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)
Re-Emissions, Lensing and FTL Propagation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt5zkYMs1SM
Dr. Louis Essen - Atomic Clock Inventor Rejects Relativity:
http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/site/harryricker/2015/05/25/dr-louis-essen-inventor-of-atomic-clock-rejects-einsteins-relativity-theory/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(INVISIBLE LINK NOT SHOWING UP! WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)
GPS, Relativity and PopScience Mythology:
http://www.alternativephysics.org/book/GPSmythology.htm
List of credible challenges to Dark Matter, Big Bang, Relativity and More:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eSV...ew?usp=sharing
Thank you for your interest,
Jason Verbelli
https://www.Facebook.com/Verbelli
Here is a compilation of videos I put together for more context:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC48DA25F1CBFA833
(INVISIBLE LINK NOT SHOWING UP! WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)
GPS, Relativity and PopScience Mythology:
http://www.alternativephysics.org/book/GPSmythology.htm
List of credible challenges to Dark Matter, Big Bang, Relativity and More:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eSV...ew?usp=sharing
Thank you for your interest,
Jason Verbelli
https://www.Facebook.com/Verbelli
Here is a compilation of videos I put together for more context:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC48DA25F1CBFA833
